« 48% Stretch the Truth, 10% Outright Lie on Their Resumes | Main | Why Is Pregnancy Discrimination on the Rise? »
May 22, 2007
Immigration Reform -- Take One
The proposed immigration reform bill hammered out in the Senate last week is starting to draw fire from all sides. That may be a good thing -- legislation that makes everyone equally unhappy is preferable to legislation that only one side likes. But I've blogged about immigration reform before. I know it's very difficult to find consensus on the issues. If only for my own benefit, I'm going to try to itemize the key elements of the bill as they affect employers and employees -- recognizing that the additional issues of border security, amnesty, family continuity and establishing legal status must also be considered.
Employer Verification of Legal Status
A big expansion over current verification practices, the bill proposes an Employment Eligibility Verification System (EEVS) that requires employers to certify the legal status of all employees (some 146 million at last count) every three years. CEOs will sign off on the certification. In a Wall Street Journal article (log in required), Randel Johnson, a US Chamber of Commerce vice president, termed the plan "throwing a huge net to catch a few minnows." Highlighting the strange bedfellows this legislation may create, the same article quotes American Civil Liberties Union spokesperson Tim Sparapani: "The threat this poses to our privacy is extraordinary."
H-1B Visa Changes
The controversial H-1B visa program for high-skilled foreign workers also gets an overhaul. The plan raises the number of H-1B visas from 65,000 to 115,000 annually and could increase further based on demand. This year's entire quota of H-1B visas was filled the first day. An additional proposal offers "unlimited" H-1B visas for non-citizens who have earned advanced degrees from a US university or from overseas institutions, in the case of those who earned advanced degrees in math, technology or engineering.
On the other side, the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers is raising money to run an ad in Congressional Quarterly, seeking to block any increase in H-1B visas. The ad states: "Thousands of highly educated and skilled U.S. hi-tech professionals have lost jobs and are unable to find new work because companies like Microsoft want to hire cheaper foreign labor."
New Rules for Low-Skilled and Guest Workers
For less-skilled workers, there are two new visa categories -- Z and Y. The Z visa provides current illegal immigrants with a path -- albeit convoluted -- to green-card status, and attempts to avoid disrupting those industries, such as food processing, restaurants and construction, that heavily depend on immigrant labor. The Y visa is a guest worker program that, together with a separate program specifically for agricultural workers, would provide legal status for low-skilled workers in some targeted industries.
The legislation is just starting to make its way through Congress. We'll see what develops over the next few weeks. For more background on immigration policies and issues, try these articles:
- "Immigration and the US Workplace"
- "Is the Melting Pot Boiling Over?"
- "Hiring Rules for Non-US Job Seekers"
And these blog suggestions:
- The H-1B Visa -- Everywhere You Want to Be Working?
- Immigration, Workers and the Blogosphere
- A Workday Without Immigrants
- The Border Line -- a blog on immigration issues offered by the Austin (TX) American-Statesman
- ImmigrationProf Blog -- authored by three professors at the University of California, Davis, School of Law
Share this post: Digg, StumbleUpon, del.icio.us, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Posted by Ryck on May 22, 2007 at 01:46 PM in Current Events , Job Search | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/8850/18685808
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Immigration Reform -- Take One:
Comments
I agree with your position that employers must be penalized for hiring illegal immigrants.
The bill, however, fails on several key points:
1) The bill requires illegal aliens to come forward. So we're now assuming that people who broke the law to enter this country will suddenly obey a new law?
2) The bill has fees for those who would work through the 'convoluted' path to citizenship. If, by definition, these people are doing the jobs that are low-paying, where will they get these fees??
3) The bill virtually ignores border security, which does little to dissuade people desire from violating our laws.
4) The bill does nothing to streamline the existing immigration process. Why should it take so long to legally immigrate? After securing the border, modernaizing the immigration path should be addressed.
5) The bill states that those who participate in the Z & Y visas have a definite timetable towards citizenship. If they fail, what happens? Mass deportation? So ... if we can have this mass deportation down the road (allegedly), why can't we have it today?
This bill must not pass!
For an easy-to-read version of the bill in its original language, see http://truthlaidbear.com/immigrationbill0518.php?page=1
Posted by: Charlie on the PA Turnpike | May 23, 2007 7:58:49 AM
WE need to secure the borders first and formost.
politicians don't get it!
Their rush to make polictical hay will sell us down the river.
911 was years ago,and still our borders are open for our enemies
to cross at their leisure.
It's not about immigration. Its about security.
Posted by: Joe | May 25, 2007 8:43:27 AM
i think passing the bill is a great idea. we are all people no matter race. the illegals are here trying to earn a living for their families like us here in the united states. granted there are some bad ones like there are bad white people, bad black people and bad asians. no matter your race, religion, age, or sex there are good and bad in all races. i am not prejudice like some people in this world but we all need to get along and give the next person a fair chance.
Posted by: leah | Jun 4, 2007 7:51:55 PM
I think that All People Should Be Treated EQUAL.. Isn't THAT what this country is all about.. The poeple who come here should be free THIS IS THE LAND OF FREEDOM. The illegals will not come forward becuase they know that immergration will send them back. I personally think that these people should have a fair chance.. You don't find any WHITE, BLACK,OR any other RACE WORKING OUTSIDE IN THE HEAT AND THE COLD BUT ALL THE PEOPLE WHO ARE REALLY TRYING TO MAKE A LIVING. If THAT WAS THE CASE THAN WHY DOES THE PRESIDENT GO TO OTHER COUNTRIES TO GET PEOPLE TO WORK IN OUR FEILDS, isn't that how some of them get here anyway? Let them live thier life as the lord gave to all people.!!!!!!! After all this is the LAND OF THE FREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
Posted by: theresa | Jul 6, 2007 2:39:37 PM
Of course bill should go thru & should pass .US is one of the biggest democratic country of the world.
People are treated here equal as it is a country, build by talented people of whole world.
People from every part of the world have their hand in development of this country.
They should not be get stopped by any unfair feelings.
Talent is appreciated here & it should not be stopped.
Posted by: Sudhir | Aug 8, 2007 11:31:51 AM
The H-1B Visas have to be controlled and continues to be a serious problem for those U.S. born citizens like myself who has a 4-yr degree in a technical field. I went to Purdue and have over 15 yrs of IT consulting experience and have a hard time obtaining a software consulting position because of all of these foreigners taking these IT jobs for the same or higher salary. It is definetely a myth when companies and managers thinking that we have a shortage here in the U.S. and that these people from India or China have better education or technical skills than us.
Posted by: Alex | Aug 8, 2007 12:31:15 PM
The main reasons and issues seem to be very illusive when it comes to this immigration issue.
Please permit me to re-open this discussion on some key questions that we all can relate to from a finite understanding of how things should work and the consequences for not abiding.
Our society has for a long time function with laws. You break the rule you pay the consequences.
Culturally, having a market saturated by a certain illegal group tends to selectively exclude the other minorities that would otherwise have a chance of getting that job.
Note: Minority in this case means “financial Minority” and includes all races and national origins in America.
After so many waves of forgiveness that tends to work in favor of a certain group that can say “I am here” faster then the rest because they are next door or of the requested demographic, the market becomes an environment that is either hostile to the legal groups or they just refuse jobs to the kids of American “Minorities” because they populate faster then baby boomers and have plenty of (“compadres”, “Amigos”, “Good old Boys”) to go around.
Even if they had decided to accept a few Americans in their circles, some of those few accepted would end up dropping out because they can no longer fit in due to the lack of cultural familiarity among other reasons; much like the “good old boys” used to and still do in their circle to maintain a homogeneous grouping as a form of preservation by ignorance and bigotry (monkey still does see and do).
Get my drift!!!!!!!
How many legal ethnic groups in the United States have sacrificed everything to give their kids an expensive education, just to find out that they are excluded from this trilateral directive because their numbers just don’t add up in our economy?
For those legal ethnic groups alone, I say until they are given a chance to at least start paying their tuition we as Americans should block by any means any increase in the fluctuation of greed and complete disregard for the law as a convenience.
Furthermore, if the American unemployment scenario cannot be rectified in all states, why the hell would we want to open our borders?
Are we just selling America bit by bit or have already signed the contract and just slow on the delivery process? (i.e. “software”, “Food”, “Manufacturing”, “textile”)
Classic scenario for your reflection:
If all the tangible goods of a society is produced else where and the so called Administrators of that society are only concerned with selling a virtual product
Much like the “snake oil peddler” what will become of that society?
……………..!!!!
Posted by: Reality Check | Aug 9, 2007 11:07:13 AM
