« Circuit City Cynicism | Main | Knowing Your Online Critics »
April 11, 2007
Is It a Mistake to Be a Stay-at-Home Mother?
A man’s career is linear, a women’s a patchwork quilt. That’s what a career coach told me when researching my book, The Mom Economy: The Mothers’ Guide to Getting Family-Friendly Work. When I wrote it, I considered whether I was stereotyping by targeting women alone. Based on the fact that 75 percent of the more than 200 women I interviewed and surveyed said they were responsible for the majority of daily domestic and child care tasks, I decided my target was apt. I wrote a book that neither advocated that women be employed nor that they "stay at home" (be non-employed); my book was a practical guide to help mothers determine how they best could meet their personal, professional and financial needs.
To sell more books, maybe I should have taken a different approach. Leslie Bennetts, a writer for Vanity Fair, has just published a book titled The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much?. In a blog post on the Huffington Post, Bennington reacts with alarm at what she calls “the avalanche of blistering attacks by women who hadn't read (her) book but couldn't wait to condemn it.” Her intention in writing the book, she says, was to point out the risks of economic dependency and the benefits of work. “Women were being lulled into a dangerous sense of complacency about relinquishing their financial autonomy,” she decided on first considering the topic of the book. She continues: “My goal was to gather into a single neat package all the financial, legal, sociological, psychological, medical, labor-force, child-rearing and other information necessary for them to protect themselves.”
Like the women she criticizes, I have not yet read Bennetts’s book. And like the women her title seems to condemn, I have taken time out of the workforce. When my third child was born, my second developed a disease in which his blood stopped clotting. With three children aged four and under, I did not return to my job. I decided instead to research and write The Mom Economy, as there was very little information on how women like me could navigate a career.
For me, the more pressing question is not whether mothers should work (more than 70 percent of mothers with school-age children do), but how we can structure our society in a way to allow us to meet our caregiving needs. We, as men and women, bear some responsibility in that mandate, both to instill change within our organizations and within our own lives.
But we also need to cease looking at our professional lives as single-powered engines that stop and start and to begin viewing them contextually. We need to stop dividing mothers into those who work and those who don’t. We all work -- just some of us happen to be leveraging our skill sets in volunteer capacities that aren’t being valued in a quantifiable way.
Maybe one day, we all will view our careers as patchwork quilts. The important thing is to keep stitching, to keep building and leveraging our skill sets so that we can command the earnings we need. The mistake, if there is one, is not feminine, nor is it staying home. The mistake is failing to recognize the continuing role of our professional skill sets in our lives and the quantifiable value those can bring to the wider world.
Share this post: Digg, StumbleUpon, del.icio.us, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Posted by Elizabeth on April 11, 2007 at 03:23 PM in Women at Work | Permalink | Comments (12) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515e7c69e200d8341c148e53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is It a Mistake to Be a Stay-at-Home Mother?:
Comments
Bravo, Elizabeth! I stayed home with two children, one of whom had (has) chronic health issues. I also was primary caregiver for seven elders. This was not considered work. Things are skewed when our society only values that for which we get a paycheck. This is not new, of course. I just really liked your post. Thanks for saying it so well.
Carol Bradley Bursack
Posted by: Carol Bradley Bursack | Apr 11, 2007 4:38:56 PM
I think history shows that working in the home (or near the home) is best for mom, dad, and the kids. It is only modern history that determined the work out of the home method.
When we had our second child, we decided that I would stay home with the kids. We pulled our belts tight, but found that the experience for us, and for the kids, was well worth the added effort.
Posted by: Kathryn Lang | Apr 11, 2007 8:44:09 PM
I agree with the post above. People seemed to be judged by how much they make rather than how good a person they are and that is so sad.
I've worked at home for over two years now and you wouldn't believe how many people don't consider it real work even though I work many more hours per day at home than I ever did at an office.
I guess I've ranted long enough....Loved the blog
********************************************************************
If you are serious about working at home and promoting your business
Click Here
Posted by: Sara | Apr 11, 2007 10:56:27 PM
My hat is doffed to you. I am a dad of two kids (11 and 4) and mom has been a stay-at-home for their entire lives. Choices need to be made: we don't "do Disney every year", like many people I know, but the kids are happy. We live in a rural part of PA, and I have a long commute, but it works for us well.
Don't nay-sayers dissuade you: it can be done.
Posted by: Charlie on the PA Turnpike | Apr 12, 2007 7:51:37 AM
Hi Elizabeth,
The ever unpopular Mr Mom here to say loved your blog. Hopefully someday people will realize our most important natural resource is our children and families can raise much better citizens then daycares. When my wife and I were dating we agreed she would stay home with the kids. After a couple of years of being home she decided she hated it and put the boys in daycare, some children seem to adjust well to daycare but my boys became very withdrawn. I tried to be supportive but found myself falling into a deep depression.
On 9/11 when the Towers fell I decided to make a change and gave her the option of quitting her clerk position and staying home or me quitting my supervisory job to stay home. That’s how I became Mr. Mom.
I’ve been home now for six years. I work while the boys are in school mowing lawns and doing some handyman jobs, during the summer the boys come with me on Thursday and Friday while I work. By working part time and taking care of the house and kids I have been able to make enough to provide all the food for my family, all the boys and my clothes, all extra curricular activities (including gear) and all medical expenses.
My oldest son turned 11 last month, he is ADHD and mildly Dyslexic, he’s currently a Purple belt in Tae-Kwon-Do and a consistent honor role student. My other son turned 10 yesterday; he is a very good baseball player and a high honor role student. The boys sing in the school choir and one earned second place in the school science fair with the other earning third place. Both are very good citizens both at school and in the community.
Yet most people I’ve met like me fine until they hear I’m a stay at home dad. Somehow this makes me a bum, or as my wife and her family say mooch.
Sorry this was so long but I wanted to point out any parent that not only stays home but is active in their children’s life is a working adult that deserves respect. Trust me it was easier to supervise 60 employees then to mow lawns, take care of the house, children and remain calm while being ridiculed for it.
Jim
Posted by: Jim | Apr 12, 2007 10:50:59 AM
I've been a stay at home mom for a very long time (my kids are well spaced!) The mistake is not thinking it through and arming yourself with the knowledge that sacrifices will have to be made no matter which choice you make. I know that my husband & I make conscious choices day in and day out to make the stay at home thing work, financially, emotionally, and mentally. It's not easy, I happen to think it's worth it, though.
Posted by: annie | Apr 12, 2007 1:33:57 PM
Sometimes, however, it's not workable for a parent to stay home with their children. I always wanted to do that, but it's just not in the cards. Sure, you may say to make more sacrifices financially, but we are already. However, it comes down to us both needing our paychecks, and my benefits. My husband works out of state, therefore his benefits do not all apply to us. My company has a better work/life balance so I'm able to take care of my son as he needs.
Posted by: Anna | Apr 13, 2007 8:24:48 AM
It's funny all the angst being raised about "Stay at home, go to work, etc. etc."
My father raised three children by himself for ten years and worked as well. Two of us turned out well. My brother went to live with my mother and her second husband and became a juvenile deliquent.
My take is that it's not the amount of time you spend with your kids - it's the quality of the time you spend with them.
I mean, I see stay at home Moms who think quality time is herding their kids to the shopping mall and stuffing them with fast "food" garbage, then parking them in front of the TV the second they return home.
Posted by: Maria | Apr 13, 2007 12:55:18 PM
Whenever I read the blogs on this issue, the 'stay-at-homes'comments always outnumber the 'works outside' types. I think both sides feel some guilt about their choice and the stay-at-homes I know daily question (especially as the kids get into high school)if it still makes sense to stay home. The moms that work outside daily compare their kids to the stay-at-homes and wonder if there will be any permanent damage to their psyche and confidence. The stay-at-homes compare their kids to the outside worker kid and wonder if their kid is too mothered with labels like helicopter mom to help them with their guilt. I'm an outside working mom that has two really great kids (also both on honor roles and one soon to be in college), and only now do I feel better about my choice. I'm watching both sides turn out either great kids or kids on the wrong track...doesn't matter if mom works or not, what seems to matter is the attention paid to those kids when the family gets together, going to ALL the school functions, volunteering in the schools, and in my family, giving up a lot of weekend couple time in order to have the family together. Except for our anniversary, my husband and I include our children in all celebrations. We rarely go to dinner with friends without our kids in tow, (though this is lessening somewhat as they're getting older) I'm not saying this works for everyone, I don't think child raising is "one lifestyle fits all" for happy, healthy kids. It just works for us and our kids. I'm looking forward to reading your book as it's about time someone blew up the stereotypes and allowed each one of us to choose what works for the good of all in the family unit.
Posted by: Michelle | Apr 17, 2007 1:28:47 AM
Jim,
Hats off to you, your kids, and the choice you and your spouse made. In my case, I take the long commute so mom stays home. But I am there for Boy Scouts and TKD, too.
Posted by: Charlie on the PA Turnpike | Apr 17, 2007 10:21:34 AM
For all of you that stay home with your children I have to say that I have the highest respect for you.
I have been a stay at home mom for 7 years. I only work when tax season rolls around and even then I have missed a couple tax seasons.
Our local family law court just removed my son from my custody because my husband (son's stepfather) is serving Active Duty in the U.S. Army. Sounds strange but I assure it's true. At the same time they also pushed me for child support. It would be counter-productive for me to work outside the home because day care expenses would exceed my income as I have three other children under school age to care for and nurture. Although the judge did agree with my argument that working would be counter-productive I was ordered to pay child support because the Attorney for my son's father argued that I had the "potential to earn".
My son is an only child in his father's household yet the father has contented himself to sit on his behind and refuses to work because "his wife makes enough money to support their family". My son is in school all day and there is no reason why his father can't work. Instead he is content to be a "stay in bed dad" and suck what little money my husband makes for defending our freedom out of us.
Point being, I am proud to stay home and care for my children. Would I like to work? Yes, but at the same time my children need me. I work the same job as anyone in a management position. It is my job to mold and train, to discipline (when necessary), to love, and raise my little "recruits" to be good citizens and an asset to this world. I am also on-call 24-7 and can cook, wash dishes, and take care of business on the telephone at the same time. I can change a diaper in 30 seconds or less. I can hold a crying baby while picking up toys and folding clothes. I can solve any problem with a hug and a kiss. What's in your job description?
Posted by: Military Wife/Mother of 4 Children | Apr 17, 2007 3:01:06 PM
With the woman clkients I've worked with, many with similar dilemmas, my encouragement was always that whatever was right for them would make them a better mother anyway.
Staying at home - or developing a career, as long as it makes you feel your best, makes you a better mother bottom line.
Regards
Martin Haworth
http://www.HowToLandYourDreamJob.com
Posted by: Martin Haworth | Apr 18, 2007 10:14:48 AM