« Tales of Secret Santas, Gift Exchanges and More Office Holiday Fun | Main | Are Obama, Ban Ki-moon and Robert Gates Great Leaders? »

December 12, 2006

Bad Fit -- When Employers and Employees Collide

It's been an interesting week for employers who want employees to follow their -- the employer's -- rules.

First, there's "Grass Company Sued Over Firing Smoker" (love those double-entendre headlines!). Former employee Scott Rodrigues is suing lawn-care giant Scotts, because Rodrigues was turfed right after he was hired when a drug test turned up nicotine. Scotts' rules state employees can't smoke, period. Not on the job, not at home, not anywhere in between. Except, as this New York Press item highlights, if you're an executive and light up "a handful of cigars" each year. Columnist Russ Smith also muses on how often Scotts execs undergo drug screening. I wonder if the company's screening program also checks for the fun chemicals employees use to green up those lawns?

The second example is Wal-Mart's firing of their recently-arrived advertising expert, Julie Roehm for, so the story goes, failing to pay for the hors d'ouveres at an ad agency party to which she was invited. Wal-Mart has a strict policy forbidding any employee from accepting the smallest gift from a prospective supplier. According to AdAge.com, this "Unruly Julie and the Scandal That Rocked the Ad World" saga is much better than Britney's underwear woes [warning: spoof] when it comes to celebrity news in ad-land.

What links these two items? Employers demanding that an employee follow an employer's rules inside and outside the day-to-day workplace. In Scotts' case, the reasoning is economic -- the company self-insures for health insurance, so smokers cost them more money. In Wal-Mart's case, the longstanding "no gifts" rule dates back to founder Sam Walton's desire to make sure Wal-Mart customers get the best deal from a supplier, not the deal that's best for the internal buyer at Wal-Mart.

What else links these two incidents? Bad employee-employer fit. Scotts' employee Rodriques knew about their policies but thought he would have time to adapt. Similarly, Roehm knew she was bringing a brash personal approach to marketing to a very staid company. So a word to the wise: Make sure you check on how you will fit within a company before you sign on. Here are few resources on how to check for company fit:

More about the Scotts lawsuit:

More about Roehm and Wal-Mart:

Share this post: Digg, StumbleUpon, del.icio.us, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Bookmark and Share

Posted by Ryck on December 12, 2006 at 02:04 PM in Current Events | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (1)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515e7c69e200d8341ff50253ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bad Fit -- When Employers and Employees Collide:

» Interesting Finds: December 12, 2006 from Jason Haley
[Read More]

Tracked on Dec 12, 2006 11:25:24 PM

Comments

O.k., I am not exaggerating when I say this is the most backwards and negative environment I have EVER been in, and I've been in RETAIL! Let's paint a picture: No training, then you're written up for not getting training but they say something like 'You should know this' how?! Without training? But that doesn't matter. If you make your goals you are harassed to make higher numbers (then repeat this step), the CEO is so beyond himself he likes to remind everyone how replaceable everyone is, how there are no jobs available...it's all about gimmie more and you're worthless...no respect, no encouragement, they make up (no validity) reviews to paint this other you you never met to give a poor review as a way to say you do not deserve a raise, so no one gets a raise, so basically: if you do what they want, they want more and you are trash. It's crazy how blatant they are about it too. It reminds me of movies I've seen of under paid slaves: They make Master what he is (successful) and slave is beaten. They try every 9 months to harass employees until they leave (avoid paying unemployment) to bring in lower paid employees and the cycle begins again. They absolutely see employees as trash. Crap bene's, very little time off and you are encouraged not to use them, no sick pay and they looooove to remind everyone of this at meetings too. There is no logic. There is no leadership. There is no consistency of how things should be done. They have stayed in business in spite of themselves. And all it is is a research job! Just research posted public sector projects looking for consultants! Wow, rocket science...everyone laughs at the CEO, President and VP behind the backs. On the same token though we are all upset to be treated so poorly 40 hrs a week. Bullies with a stick, that's all. Then they act like "What? Why would anyone be upset here....it's the employee, not the employer." Delusional. It's maddening to be there. I know there is no such thing as job security but to be an absolute nightmare to another human being is sickening. Oh, and that open door policy? Forget it, they own the company and are related. If you have a valid complaint it just makes your bullseye bigger. AND lastly, they make the worst business decisions...ugh. Runaway!

Posted by: Karissa Armentrout | May 6, 2009 2:51:12 PM

Post a comment