« Top 10 Boss Sins and Boss Insecurity | Main | The Corporate Untouchables »
October 19, 2006
Email or Face-to-Face
I once worked in a newspaper newsroom that was almost dead silent. The only audible sounds were keyboard tapping and the one-sided conversations of reporters into the mouthpieces of their phones. People sat shoulder to shoulder and never exchanged a word. I was young, 26 years old, and assumed that everyone kept interoffice communication to a minimum because of daily deadlines. This was before the days of widespread IM use, so I had no reason to suspect otherwise.
My assumption was upended when, a few days into the job, a colleague on the Arts and Culture desk sent me a message on the intercompany email exchange. Apparently, some colleagues had decided that I was the most fit at the Money desk. It was bizarre to say the least, not to mention unnerving. What else had they decided via email that they’d never have dared to discuss face-to-face on the office floor?
With the growth of IMing and email now such a dominant tool in intercompany communication, my take on the silent workspace is somewhat more jaded. Dead-quiet workspaces unsettle me. Why isn’t anyone talking, and if they are, why aren’t they willing to stand publicly behind their voice?
We freely LOL and !!! when we’d rarely be that loud in our cubicles. Our smiles look nothing like a perfect :), but online, we use those smiles so liberally they’ll soon be listed as a punctuation form in Wikipedia. We talk in caps with abandon, though the only person I’ve ever known to really speak compellingly that way is John Irving’s Owen Meany.
And those are the more benign examples. Think to what lengths others are willing to go in text, Mark Foley notwithstanding.
When possible, I’m a face-to-face advocate. This form of conversation can be more disruptive, but it also operates as a self-check. Is what I have to say important enough to interrupt another colleague’s flow of work or, sometimes even more crucially, unimportant enough to do the same?
I’m not saying we should eliminate email altogether. But I do think we need to be more judicious in when and what we send. When I punctuate my emails with exclamation points, would a simple modifier be more in keeping with who I am? (I can understand why my 10-year-old’s best friend uses multiple exclamation points after her long-distance “I miss you” sign-off, but professional adults?) For that matter, couldn’t that :) be better communicated with words, or is it really a disingenuous smile after a harsh word? If that’s the case, please talk to me in person about it. And as for that party-list-length CC, is what I have to say worthy of chinking a glass and commanding the attention of a whole room?
I have to admit, I break all these guidelines daily, which makes me a total hypocrite. And I am feeling a tad cynical today. But really, I’m trying. RU?!! (just kidding, :) LOL!!
Share this post: Digg, StumbleUpon, del.icio.us, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Posted by Elizabeth on October 19, 2006 at 11:11 AM in The Daily Grind | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515e7c69e200d83453953969e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Email or Face-to-Face:
Comments
I totally agree with you. When I was in the corporate world I had to write staff up repeatedly about attempting to settle altercations and disputes in an email or voicemail. It just seems that people are bolder in electronic medias than in person and it gives them the "out" for passing the buck. I sent an email to so and so, therefore I don't own it anymore...Now that I am self employed and lead career seminars and training, it isn't getting any better with the workforce getting younger and younger. I guess we better LOL! To stop from crying (:
Posted by: Tonya | Oct 29, 2006 12:07:40 AM
this is a huge problem even more excellerated by the youngest generation of very talented collegues at work.
There seems to be a second stream of IM communication that runs like an undercurrent below the formal email and less and less verbal communication.Otherwise fairly polite and level headed top level email communcation is
confused by the Carping underway in the IM Basement level communication.its a breeding ground for both
discenters as well as work team members avoiding the real issues and learning to call for a standup meeting or even god forbid a real honest communcation where issues are attempted to be resolved or mediated.Imagine the cost of most of these negative undercurrents to morale and workflow.I certainly agree that some of the IM exchenges are also productive for urgent situations.
regards.,
Posted by: william | Oct 31, 2006 9:09:24 PM
I think the real problem is that communications on all levels in the workplace has become less than professional. The "most fit" comment would be as unwelcome in person as it was in email. The idea of attempting to rectify that by choosing one method of communication over another is missing the point.
IM and face-to-face are generally equivalent. They both require real-time participation, and they can be open meetings, private, closed-door heart-to-hearts, or water cooler gossip. The subjects and language that were appropriate in face-to-face conversations are still appropriate in IM chats. The things that were inappropriate in face-to-face conversations are no less inappropriate in chats or email.
Email allows the recipient to choose their best time to deal with your communication, and to shelve it without losing it if it doesn't fit their current priorities. It also keeps a record of the communication, which is a great thing unless your intent is to obfuscate, or to break the law. I've often told my folks who are asking me for something to send me an email. "The mind forgets, the email remembers," I tell them.
There are business communications I consider email inappropriate for. Firing people electronically is the lowest form of cowardice, as is any disciplinary action. And recognition should be given in person, and publicly where possible.
All of that said, I'm an MBWA guy (management by wandering around). Face time is important for both parties for multiple reasons. Business is relationships. Much of those relationships is set by the tone of a smile, or the warning of a frown (yeah, I know there's a smiley for that). Business trouble can usually be averted, if detected in day-to-day, face-to-face communication, long before an email, blog or chat would be generated. Also, success in business is performance, and personal difficulties affect performance, so professionalism doesn't always mean, "stick to business." But even when it deals with personal matters, it needs to be kept to professional standards. The "most fit" comment would not meet my standards of professionalism in the workplace, in any form of communication.
Posted by: JimT | Nov 7, 2006 12:25:41 PM
I think E Mail is a very good communication tool. You can save it in a folder on your hard drive and then make a hard copy for your file, but if it involves a change in employment status, pay, position or an office proedure I feel it needs to be backed up verbally so that if there are questions they can then be answered. Some people are visual processors and some are auditory processors so both forms are good. If it is in writing you can't use the excuse of saying "I didn't hear you say that" or someone can say"I never received the e mail so that is why both should be used together as much as possible.
Posted by: amy heflin | Nov 7, 2006 8:32:37 PM
Its weird how some things are done in the office anymore. I used to share an office with my boss and he used to send me emails telling me that we need to have this and this done today so that we can move onto the next project. Do you know what the kicker was? Our desks sat practically side by side - he was 5 feet away from me. You would think that he would want to talk to me in person to make sure that we 'are on the same wavelength' instead of sending me an email. Now, I was the type of person that stayed busy during the day, but I could of given him 5-10 minutes (or however long he needed) to talk to me. I guess communicating in person was too much for him. As they say, you give someone some authority and they think they are 'high and mighty'. Lucky for me, his boss moved us out of the office into our own offices. I actually had the upper hand on the entire thing - I dont work for that 'ah-hem' anymore. You would think by keeping the lines of communication open, that would be the best thing ... but for some people that is too much.
Posted by: Karen | Apr 20, 2007 10:59:24 AM
Hello,
I am not sure this is the right place for this,
But i came across website/service that claim he is going to be major then
Visa,myspace or ford!??
Its called the "evolution" the day that will change pages in the history
Of the web,everyone, i mean, everyone, will make money from the net,
Everybody will Earn from Everything WEB2 what is called, and this is already here
!@
I really appriciate if you can check it out and make some comments,
http://tinyurl.com/3y2spf
Thank you
Posted by: volatages921 | Jun 27, 2007 7:54:06 AM
I just wanted to say WOW!o
Posted by: Katie | Jul 2, 2007 5:56:53 PM
Thank you very much.
Posted by: Helga | Jul 4, 2007 8:09:50 AM