« Make Way for the New Corporate Buzzwords | Main | Do You Text? You Could Be Next »

August 08, 2006

Work/Life Balance Is Everyone's Issue

Pity the poor Wall Street investment banks. After decades of a human resource management strategy best summarized by Hollywood character Gordon Gekko -- "Greed is good!" -- the banks now find it harder to attract the best candidates and retain their most promising employees.

Highlighting this problem is an excellent story from Sunday's New York Times: "Wall Street's Women Face a Fork in the Road" (log in required), which goes into great anecdotal detail about work/life balance issues facing women working in the high-pressure world of international finance and the trade-offs they feel forced to make. What struck me while reading the piece was how often this topic is framed in terms of gender bias.

At the risk of putting my foot deep into the quicksand of gender politics, I don't think that's the case here. Employer gender bias is not the problem. It's a diversity issue. This employer behavior excludes not just women trying to balance work and family roles, but also older workers and employees from different cultures and traditions. No less than Lehman Brothers president Joe Gregory is quoted in the story: "You can't build a great company without great people, and great people are not just white, straight men aged 25 to 40."

When employers don't recognize that inflexible and too-demanding work environments are forcing out desirable employees and turning their replacements away at the door, everybody suffers. Not just women, but men, older workers and multicultural candidates of all varieties. And we're not just talking about the high stakes, Master of the Universe finance world satirized in Tom Wolfe's Bonfire of the Vanities, either. Even in industries that have long had a somewhat more diverse and gender-balanced playing field -- the advertising, marketing, publishing and media worlds where I've spent my career, for example -- employer pressures are similar.

I'm guilty of not raising more Cain about this issue with past employers. Like so many men, I would knuckle under when employers expect 60- to 80-hour work weeks in exchange for promised riches. Happily, women are more outspoken in demanding a better deal for themselves in the face of extreme employer expectations.

So here's my modest suggestion: Let's all work a little harder to make sure this debate about better work/life balance is less gender-specific and more inclusive. More diverse. We all deserve it.

To learn more about work/life balance issues and what you can do, try these articles:

Share this post: Digg, StumbleUpon, del.icio.us, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Bookmark and Share

Posted by Ryck on August 8, 2006 at 01:11 PM in Women at Work | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515e7c69e200d834db7f2269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Work/Life Balance Is Everyone's Issue:

Comments

Wow! Great quote from Joe Gregory. That said, when I hear quotes like this from CEOs I always wonder whether anything will really change. As long as there's a supply of those "white, straight men aged 25 to 40" who are willing to work endless hours without any type of work/life balance, will companies really be incentivized to diversity their workforce?

Posted by: Carmen Van Kerckhove | Aug 8, 2006 6:05:59 PM

Some jobs are more demanding than others and have stricter rules. Do female doctors complain, that they can't work from home?

Wall Street has its benefits over finance industries of other countries. For example in France people in finance have 35 hours work-week, 2-month vacations and excellent job securuty. But in general the compensations in Frech finance are lame, and most of the US people don't want to work there (and many french finance graduates). If the French model was better for business, it would win over the US model. However it didn't happen

Posted by: Andrey | Aug 30, 2006 3:45:37 PM

Joel your comments are right on target. Not only is balance much more than a women's issue, the only way we will see meaningful change in terms of both how work is structured and how success is defined is when men also demand the opportunity to have a life outside of the office. Until then, the flex debate will remain mired down by the "women's issue" label.

As for Carmen's comment about some jobs being more demanding and having stricter work rules, that's true to an extent, but it is also an excuse. Companies find solutions for people they really want to keep.Period. And companies that place the highest value on talent, understand that the demographic trends are NOT in their favor. Thus, they are racing to find solutions.

Bottom line, the way many jobs have been structured in the past (18x7, in a downtown corporate office)is not the way they will be structured in the future. And the winners in the war for talent will be the ones who find the most creative solutions the fastest.

Posted by: Corbette Doyle | Oct 8, 2006 11:13:41 AM

I find it very fascinating how we as a society have an abundance of modern conveniences, yet we are more inconvenienced and more stressed than ever before. We have so many choices, options and things to want. We are all very busy people, doing so much, but somehow leaving out the most important things. Since so many of us are living our lives in chaos, life-balance seems to be a hot topic these days. Is there any such thing as balance? Can we successfully keep all the balls spinning on every facet of our lives and also feel energized, well rested and ready for the next day? I’d like to ditch the word balance and replace it the prioritization. I believe we need to get over the notion that we should actually do it all each and every day and somehow it is supposed to all fit and appear balanced. Each day we have to ask ourselves, “What are the priorities today, what are the priorities in my life overall?” “Does my daily doings reflect that?”

Posted by: Robin Allen | Oct 28, 2007 4:42:02 AM

We live in a loop, we want luxuries in our life so we need to work hard, which leaves us no time to enjoy the luxuries we wanted.

I wonder what life was before electricity and TV..

Posted by: kobi | Jan 30, 2009 11:55:25 AM

Post a comment